posted on: Wednesday, March 23rd, 2005
Drills
by Rick Faye
Rating: 4 out of 5 | Votes: 29This Article has been viewed 517 time(s). My name is Rick Faye. I have run the Minnesota Kali Group, a martial
arts school in Minneapolis, Minnesota, for over twenty years.
I see we are once again in the midst of controversy as yet another
generation asserts itself. There seems to be a new examination of
whether drills in martial arts are productive. Along with this seems
to go a wholesale disposal of technical information from the arts we
train.
First off, let me say that I am adding my opinion as a way to
solidify my own thoughts, and to constantly re-examine what we teach
and train at the Minnesota Kali Group. I don’t have any great hope
of changing minds (they seem to be quite convinced of their own
genius). I’m also not here to challenge anyone’s abilities. The
J.K.D. family has always been full of people much more physically
talented than I.
I will weigh in with what experience I have. It seems to me that
Sifu Dan Inosanto has settled these issues at every seminar for the
last twenty-five years. I’ll try to repeat, in my own language, the
messages that seemed so obvious to me from the very start.
Drills work, and are necessary for most students. Drills themselves
are not fighting – that’s understood, and this has been pointed out
at every seminar I have ever been to. Drills allow students to go
through a progressive learning process, and make the art accessible
to many different types of students. Drills help to pass on
combative and developmental insights gained over time at the cost of
many lives. Drills allow concentrated repetition on important
aspects of the art. Drills also happen to be fun, which is important
for those of us who don’t spend every waking moment trying to “kick
ass” on the next random attacker.
In martial arts we are in the business of trying to modify how
people act under stress. This generation has come up with the
stunning revelation that personal combat is an aggressive, frenzied,
painful and nasty business where things get very difficult. (I’m
sure the warriors of the ages will be thankful that someone has
finally discovered the true nature of combat.) It will be
interesting to see how they go about passing these insights on to
students of different abilities, different personalities, different
values, and different needs. Could it be that creating drills of
some sort would help the student get a glimpse of their instructor’s
true brilliance?
I apologize for the tone of these statements, but it seems to me
that people are overstepping. Sifu Inosanto, Master Chai, and many
other great martial artists have taught us through drills. So now,
we have students who make their personal discoveries public, and are
inadvertently disrespectful to those who taught them. (Respect of
any kind is one of the deeper values that has left martial arts in
the last years.) Are they questioning the intellect or the sincerity
of these teachers? Either they don’t see these instructors as smart
enough to guide students correctly, or they believe they are somehow
filling the time with useless fluff. I don’t see either of these as
the truth.
There are good reasons why most martial systems take many years
to “declare” a student a “master” or even an instructor. The
perspective and maturity gained by years in the arts are very
important. You need perspective to understand complete developmental
cycles for many kinds of students. You also need perspective to
understand the many different ways to approach the art. You need
maturity to be able to understand the place for your capabilities in
life. You also need maturity to assess your role as instructor and
as a martial artist in life. The martial artists that I admire are
outwardly mild and easily approachable. They think and act on many
levels – most of them much deeper than just fighting.
Next point: we have been constantly told three related things.
Number one: just because the technique or strategy doesn’t work for
you in your circumstance doesn’t mean it doesn’t work. The fact that
a technique doesn’t work is not always because it is structurally
ineffective. Most failures in martial arts are due to a problem in
attributes, such as distancing, timing, rhythm, strength, line
familiarization, etc. It could also be that the technique was tried
in the wrong circumstance. A gym is not always the best format for
each technique.
Two: we should constantly experiment to find what does work for us
at this stage of our development. As we experiment with different
things, we will find that we are able to do some things quite
naturally, and that others will take development.
Three: we should determine what attributes we need to train to
become functional in a given area. Many of the drills we do are
designed to improve certain attributes. Like weight training, they
are more about development than they are directly related to
fighting. In many aspects of the arts, we simply need more
repetition on specific motions. Drills are often the best way to get
the desired repetitions in the shortest amount of time.
Martial arts are an intensely personal search. To discredit anyone’s
way of practicing his art, is very arrogant, and not a credit to
Sifu Inosanto’s example. Sifu Inosanto has always taught us that
each individual will find his or her own way. Some, however, will
find their way and then tell everyone about it. This assumes a level
of accomplishment, intellect, ability and insight that may not
actually be there, other than in the mind of that person.
I believe we can all find something in the arts that fascinate us.
Yes, we need to examine the material for function and application.
In our analysis, we need to keep in mind a broader context. The art
should serve as a tool for self-development as well as self-defense.
There is room for more than one area of training. To narrow our
focus to include only what works against a determined athlete in the
gym when performed by a talented athlete is to set “limitations” on
J.K.D. I admire the athleticism and durability of extreme
competitors, but it remains a small part of this great art. Extreme
contact is not for everyone, and should not dictate our
training. “Ultimate” or “Extreme” formats can be learned from, and
that knowledge should be added to the things in which we train, not
replace them completely.
As for the Minnesota Kali Group, we will continue to use drills to
train our students. Making this art accessible to a wider variety of
students has been my goal, and I will continue to seek out methods
that allow average people to improve their lives. If you get a
chance to visit, look forward to working on Thai Boxing
combinations, Sumbrada and other great stick drills, a whole variety
of drills for sensitivity and body feel, set focus mitt
combinations, grappling drills, and equipment training set out in
combinations. You’ll find all sorts of students having a great time,
and improving in all sorts of areas.